Top Tech Wellness Products1. Best Air Tube Headphones for EMF Protection in 2023 • Earbuds with Incredible Sound 2. 2023's Best WiFi Kill Switch. Turn Off WiFi With One Click. Get EMF Protection For Better Sleep and Calmer Days 3. High Speed Cat 8 EMF Protection Ethernet Cable. Hardwire For Fastest Internet Speed 4. No EMF Alarm Clock. Keep The Bedroom EMF Radiation Free! Best Silent Analog Alarm Clock 5. Fast Grounded Lightning Ethernet Adapter. Use iPhone Online with NO Radio Frequency EMF 6. Sleep Prep Glasses. Wrap To Block More Blue Light! 2 Styles: Complete Block And Over Glasses Blockers 7. Super Power EMF Detector! All NEW Safe Sound II EMF Meter 8. EMF Protection Starter Pack 9. 2023 Best•Cutest Blue Light Blockers. Daytime Glasses Reduce Glare On All Screens 10. Faraday Bags. Quality• Affordable• Sleek Faraday Cellphone Case for Privacy + EMF Protection That Works! 11. Hard Wire KIT! Turn Off WiFi and wire up your internet. Connect All Devices To The Internet--Phones laptops, tablets All EMF-Free! 12. Tri Field EMF Meter. My Top Pick for EMF Detection. Find All EMF: Electric, Magnetic EMF, Dirty Electricity and RF Radiation. 13. Top EMF Reader. Professional EMF Radiation Meter Rated BEST By Experts• FREE SHIPPING! 14. Key Fob Faraday Protectors That Are Pretty and Practical In Colorful Nylon 15. What is Blue Light? Save On The New Tech Wellness Blue Light Blocking Bundle! Three Glasses To Cover All Kinds Of Blue Light 16. De-Stress Dough. Relax And Play. Digital Detox Therapy in A Jar For Mind, Body and Soul 17. Screen Cleansing Wipes. Our Fav New Screen Wipes! Clean Glasses, Laptops, Phones and Tablets- 18. Private Consultation with Tech Wellness Founder August Brice 19. Mom's Pretty Pink Gift Set Holidy Set Women LOVE! 20. Screen-Free Fun! Get the Kids OFF-LINE! Build A Solar Car, Non-Toxic Playdoh, Bubbles, Crayons 21. Disconnect Gift Set: De-Stress Dough, WiFi Switch, Coloring Set
Dr. Carlo Letter to AT&T about Cell Phone Danger
At Tech Wellness, our goal is to be your trusted source for information about EMF and all things wireless energy. That’s no small feat, because when you start looking around you’ll see a lot of pretty crazy claims and contradicting information out there—and some of it is downright scary. That’s why we’re seeking out true, world-class experts in the field, including the man who literally wrote the book on cell phone radiation entitled Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age,
In that book is a copy of the letter that Dr. Carlo wrote to AT&T on WTR stationery. (You can see the contents of the letter below) He also sent a copy of the letter to 28 CEO's of the mobile phone or cellular or wireless industry. Dr. George Carlo, our science and public policy expert, shares his story in the movie Generation Zapped. He's also quoted in many blog posts, here, he talks about Cancer and Cellphone Radiation and here: Guide To Radio Frequency RF, EMF Wireless Energy and Electro-smog
Be aware of the EMF radiation coming from your phone and other devices with your own EMF Meter. The most important tool for EMF Protection!
Learn more about his work here.
Letter to AT&T
7 October 1999
Mr. C. Michael Armstrong
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer AT & T Corporation
32 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 100313-2412
Dear Mr. Armstrong:
After much thought, I am writing this letter to you, personally, to ask your assistance in solving what I believe is an emerging and serious problem concerning wireless phones. I write this letter in the interest of the more than 80 million wireless phone users in the United States and the more than 200 million worldwide. But I also write this letter in the interest of your industry, a critical part of our social and economic infrastructure.
Since 1993, I have headed the WTR surveillance and research program funded by the wireless industry. The goal of WTR has always been to identify and solve any problems concerning consumers' health that could arise from the use of these phones. This past February, at the annual convention of the CTIA, I met with the full board of that organization to brief them on some surprising findings from our work. I do not recall if you were there personally, but my understanding is that all segments of the industry were represented.
At that briefing, I explained that the well-conducted scientific studies that WTR was overseeing indicated that the question of wireless phone safety had become confused.
Specifically, I reported to you that:
The rate of death from brain cancer among handheld phone users was higher than the rate of brain cancer death among those who used non-handheld phones that were away from their head;
The risk of acoustic neuroma, a benign tumour of the auditory nerve that is well in range of the radiation coming from a phone's antenna system, was fifty percent higher in people who reported using cell phones for six years or more, moreover, that relationship between the amount of cell phone use and this tumour appeared to follow a dose-response curve;
The risk of rare neuro epithelial tumours on the outside of the brain was more than doubled, a statistically significant risk increase, in cell phone users as compared to people who did not use cell phones;
There appeared to be some correlation between brain tumours occurring on the right side of the head and the use of the phone on the right side of the head;
Laboratory studies looking at the ability of radiation from a phone's antenna system to cause functional genetic damage were definitively positive, and were following a dose-responsive relationship.
I also indicated that while our overall study of brain cancer occurrence did not show a correlation with cell phone use, the vast majority of the tumours that were studied were well out of range of the radiation that one would expect from a cell phone's antenna. Because of that distance, the finding of no effect was questionable. (Aegis Note: The entire phone is an antenna). Such misclassification of radiation exposure would tend to dilute any real effect that may have been present. In addition, I reported to you that the genetic damage studies we conducted to look at the ability of radiation from the phones to break DNA were negative, but that the positive finding of functional DNA damage could be more important, perhaps indicating a problem that is not dependent on DNA breakage, and that these inconsistencies needed to be clarified. I reported that while none of these findings alone were evidence of a definitive health hazard from wireless phones, the pattern of potential health effects evidenced by different types of studies, from different laboratories and by different investigators, raised serious questions.
Following my presentation, I heard by voice vote of those present, a pledge to "do the right thing in following up these findings" and a commitment of the necessary funds.
When I took on the responsibility of doing this work for you, I pledged five years. I was asked to continue on through the end of a sixth year, and agreed. My tenure is now completed. My presentation to you and the CTIA board in February was not an effort to lengthen my tenure at WTR, nor to lengthen the tenure of WTR itself. I was simply doing my job of letting you know what we found and what needed to be done following from our findings. I made this expressly clear during my presentation to you and in many subsequent conversations with members of your industry and the media.
Today, I sit here extremely frustrated and concerned that appropriate steps have not been taken by the wireless industry to protect consumers during this time of uncertainty about safety. The steps I am referring to were specifically followed from the WTR program and have been recommended repeatedly in public and private for and by me and other experts from around the world. As I prepare to move away from the wireless phone issue and into a different public health direction, I am concerned that the wireless industry is missing a valuable opportunity by dealing with these public health concerns through politics, creating illusions that more research over the next several years helps consumers today, and false claims that regulatory compliance means safety. The better choice by the wireless industry would be to implement measured steps aimed at true consumer protection.
Alarmingly, indications are that some segments of the industry have ignored the scientific findings suggesting potential health effects, have repeatedly and falsely claimed that wireless phones are safe for all consumers including children, and have created an illusion of responsible follow up by calling for and supporting more research. The most important measures of consumer protection are missing: complete and honest factual information to allow informed judgment by consumers about assumption of risk; the direct tracking and monitoring of what happens to consumers who use wireless phones; and, the monitoring of changes in the technology that could impact health.
I am especially concerned about what appear to be actions by a segment of the industry to
conscript the FCC, the FDA and The World Health Organization with them in following a non- effectual course that will likely result in a regulatory and consumer backlash.
As an industry, you will have to deal with the fallout from all of your choices, good and bad, in the long term. But short term, I would like your help in effectuating an important public health intervention today.
The question of wireless phone safety is unclear. Therefore, from a public health perspective, it is critical for consumers to have the information they need to make an informed judgment about how much of this unknown risk they wish to assume in their use of wireless phones.
Informing consumers openly and honestly about what is known and not-known about health risks is not liability laden - it is evidence that your industry is being responsible, and doing all it can to assure safe use of its products. The current popular backlash we are witnessing in the United States today against the tobacco industry is derived in large part from perceived dishonesty on the part of that industry in not being forthright about health effects. I urge you to help your industry not repeat that mistake.
As we close out the business of the WTR, I would like to openly ask for your help in distributing the summary findings we have complied of our work. This last action is what always has been anticipated and forecast in the WTR's research agenda. I have asked another organization with which I am affiliated, The Health Risk Management Group (HRMG), to help us with this public health intervention step, and to put together a consumer information package for widespread distribution. Because neither WTR nor HRMG have the means to effectuate this intervention, I am asking you to help us do the right thing.
I would be happy to talk to you personally about this. Sincerely yours
George L. Carlo Ph.D, M.S., J.D Chairman
Wireless Technology Research LLC
So interesting isn't it?- This cellphone-cancer warning letter was sent to all the major players in the Telecom industry in the 90's!
Since then the cellphone industry has done everything it can do to minimize or cast aspersions on any news that might threaten their cash cow. Do we really need wireless connections on every block, super powerful WiFi's and boosters and 5G phones? Our 5G Guide explains just how CRA it's become.
The great news is more and more of us are becoming aware. And even better more and more people are deciding not to get the latest devices, boosters and high powered WiFis. They're removing wireless antenna's from their TV's and smart appliances going on Airplane mode whenever they're not using their phone or tablet. Best of all, 1,000's of smart families are Hard Wiring Their Homes and using the internet without any wireless radiation at all!
Did you know that just year ago the FCC was sued for not taking the latest science into account when they announced their antiquated SAR standards still held up?
Yes- thank Devra Davis and Theodora Scarato from the Environmental Health Trust along with the Children's Health Defense and people like Dr. George Carlo for alerting us decades ago.
I met Dr Carlo over 15 years ago, when the person who held the original patent on AirTube headphones, introduced us. I loved the Air tube headphones because they allowed me to use the phone without feeling heat and "sparks" in my ears. I wanted to talk to someone who could help me figure out why I couldn't hold a phone in my hands without feeling it.
Dr. Carlo realized that I was experiencing symptoms of Electromagnetic Sensitivity Syndrome from man made EMF and advised me of the Precautionary Principle and introduced me to the latest research.
There are now literally thousands of research studies linking electromagnetic radiation or wireless radiation- from any and all of our devices to negative health effects.
We have zero doubt that cellphone radiation has a biological effect. Zero. Some people are sensitive like me and some feel nothing, but regardless our bodies react on a cellular level.
If you'd like to know more about the invisible wireless radiation that's spews from all our devices, I've written an EMF Guide with Solutions
If you're convinced that you need to do something to safeguard you and your family check out our EMF Protection products in out Shop. You'll see there's no crystals or phone case shields or laptop shields or clothing. We recommend shielding for your bed, for your walls and for your home because theirs little chance that full shielding can backfire and send more EMF radiation to your body. We only support products that we've used, tested and are research backed.
The Best EMF Protection is Free!
Distance Is Your Friend has been my EMF mantra for decades. That's why I offer a remote switch to turn off your WiFi- so you don't have to get close to the source of WiFi EMF- which is the antenna. I offer AirTube Wired headphones that are super long so you don't have to be close to your phone while you're on a call and great little straps that allow you to keep your phone from touching your body.
The reason distance is your friend when it comes to any wireless device is that EMF radiation is strongest at the source. In the case of your devices, the antennas or receivers are the point where all the radiation congregates. It's super powerful and potent, but EMF radiation dissipates as you get further from the source. This video gives talks a bit more about this concept: